Elon Musk’s Auschwitz Visit Sparks Controversy: Survivor’s Partner Speaks Out
Auschwitz-Birkenau stands as a solemn reminder of the Holocaust, a tragedy that claimed millions of lives, including Jewish people, political prisoners, and other marginalized groups. Today, it serves as a site for education, remembrance, and reflection. For Holocaust survivor Gidon Lev, the camp carries deeply personal significance—it is where his father, Ernst Lev, lost his life during a harrowing death march.
In January 2024, Lev visited Auschwitz as a “special guest,” accompanied by his partner, Julie Gray, and billionaire Elon Musk. What initially seemed like an opportunity to amplify the importance of Holocaust remembrance has since become a source of controversy, with Gray publicly criticizing Musk’s conduct during the visit.
A Moment of Profound Significance
Gidon Lev, originally from Czechoslovakia and now an Israeli dairy farmer, has dedicated much of his life to sharing his story as a Holocaust survivor. His visit to Auschwitz was both emotional and deeply personal, as it marked a return to the site where his father perished during the Holocaust.
Julie Gray, Lev’s partner, is a California native who moved to Israel in 2012. She has been an advocate for Holocaust education and awareness, often accompanying Lev to events and memorials. Reflecting on the visit, Gray described it as a poignant moment for Lev, who was confronted with the painful history of his father’s tragic death.
However, Gray’s recollection of the visit also includes sharp criticisms of Musk’s behavior.
Julie Gray’s Critique of Elon Musk
In a Facebook post dated January 22, Gray accused Musk of being indifferent and detached during the Auschwitz visit. She described Musk’s demeanor as self-centered, focused more on his public image than the historical and emotional weight of the site.
“I spent hours with Elon Musk and walked with him through Auschwitz,” Gray wrote. “For Gidon, this visit was deeply meaningful—standing where his father died was a profound moment. Musk, on the other hand, appeared unmoved, more concerned with his entourage and the cameras.”
Gray also expressed regret over including Musk in the visit, which she initially believed would help raise awareness about Holocaust remembrance. “I am embarrassed that I have photos of this on my phone,” she admitted. “We thought it would be good publicity, but I would not share those photos today.”
Allegations of Insincerity
According to Gray, Musk’s behavior during the visit lacked the empathy and respect expected in such a setting. She recalled his apparent disinterest while observing exhibits, such as the preserved heaps of victims’ belongings, and criticized his approach as a “press junket.”
“When he placed a wreath at Auschwitz and Gidon was overlooked, he walked away with the cameras whirring,” Gray wrote. “This is Elon Musk—a sociopath, if ever there was one. To deduce from this visit that he is a friend of the Jews is desperately naive.”
Gray’s comments come at a time when Musk’s public actions and statements have drawn scrutiny. Just days before her post, Musk was accused of making a controversial hand gesture, described by some as a “Nazi salute,” during Donald Trump’s inauguration. Additionally, Musk faced backlash for tweeting Holocaust-related jokes that many found distasteful.
The Anti-Defamation League Responds
Musk’s recent actions have also prompted responses from organizations like the Anti-Defamation League (ADL). Initially dismissing Musk’s alleged Nazi salute as an awkward gesture, the ADL later issued a stronger condemnation following his controversial tweets.
“The Holocaust was a singularly evil event, and it is inappropriate and offensive to make light of it,” ADL CEO Jonathan Greenblatt stated. “The Holocaust is not a joke.”
Gray’s account has further fueled criticism of Musk, with many questioning the sincerity of his involvement in Holocaust education initiatives.
A Missed Opportunity
Musk’s visit to Auschwitz coincided with his participation in a symposium on antisemitism during the European Jewish Association’s conference in Krakow, Poland. At the time, his involvement was viewed by some as an effort to address rising antisemitism, particularly online. However, Gray’s account of his behavior suggests that the visit was a missed opportunity for meaningful engagement.
“For public figures like Musk, visiting a site like Auschwitz should be about reflection, education, and honoring the memories of those who suffered and died,” Gray emphasized. “Instead, it felt like a hollow gesture.”
The Importance of Genuine Remembrance
As Holocaust survivors like Gidon Lev grow fewer in number, the responsibility to preserve their stories becomes ever more critical. Public figures with significant platforms have the power to amplify these narratives, but such efforts must be accompanied by genuine care and respect.
Gray’s critique serves as a reminder of the importance of sincerity when addressing sensitive historical subjects. For those like Lev, who have experienced the devastating consequences of the Holocaust firsthand, moments of remembrance are sacred. It is essential that they be approached with empathy and reverence, especially by those in the public eye.
Conclusion
Elon Musk’s visit to Auschwitz could have been a powerful statement in support of Holocaust education and the fight against antisemitism. However, according to Julie Gray, the visit fell short of its potential, marked by detachment and missed opportunities for genuine connection.
As the world continues to combat hate and preserve the memory of the Holocaust, the importance of sincere and respectful engagement cannot be overstated. For survivors like Gidon Lev, their stories deserve to be honored—not overshadowed by controversy.
