Note: video can be found at the end of the article
In a rapidly escalating political and legal showdown, Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY) is facing renewed scrutiny over her role in an immigration rights webinar that critics allege may have crossed into legally dangerous territory.
This comes after former federal prosecutor Jonathan Fahey appeared on Fox News, where he argued that AOC’s recent outreach efforts toward undocumented immigrants—particularly a bilingual webinar advising them on how to handle encounters with immigration enforcement—could be “skirting the line” of federal law.
The explosive comments come on the heels of warnings from former Trump administration immigration chief Tom Homan, who said he is actively seeking a formal opinion from the Department of Justice on whether Ocasio-Cortez’s actions could amount to “impediment,” a term that—if applied legally—might constitute a felony offense.
Here’s what happened, what’s being alleged, and why this could become a landmark legal and political confrontation.
AOC’s Webinar Sparks Controversy
Earlier this year, Rep. Ocasio-Cortez organized and participated in a public immigration rights webinar that offered information in both English and Spanish. The event featured legal experts from the Immigrant Defense Project, including attorney Genia Blaser, who outlined constitutional protections for immigrants and explained what to do during an encounter with U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE).
The webinar focused on key points such as:
-
The right to remain silent
-
The requirement for ICE agents to produce a judge-signed warrant to enter a home
-
The importance of asking ICE agents to “slip the warrant under the door”
-
Legal aid options available to individuals facing deportation proceedings
A flyer shared on Ocasio-Cortez’s official website reiterates many of these points and provides contact information for free legal assistance, including how to file privacy release forms to authorize congressional offices to intervene on an immigrant’s behalf.
While immigrant rights groups praised the event as necessary and timely, critics—including former government officials—have voiced alarm.
Fahey: “She’s Skirting the Line Legally”
Speaking to Fox News anchor Bryan Llenas, Jonathan Fahey—a former acting assistant secretary at the Department of Homeland Security and a federal prosecutor—delivered a stark warning about the potential legal consequences.
“I think where she’s really skirting the line is on a couple of things,” Fahey said. “One, is this obstruction of justice? Are these webinars designed to truly educate people, or are they a ruse designed to keep illegal aliens in the country?”
Fahey went on to say that certain public statements made by Ocasio-Cortez reflect a misunderstanding—or mischaracterization—of federal immigration law.
“When she mocks Tom Homan and says it’s not a crime to be here illegally, she’s incorrect. Most of these individuals entered illegally, and that is a crime,” he added.
He also raised the issue of harboring, citing federal statutes that prohibit shielding or encouraging undocumented immigrants to remain in the U.S. illegally.
“If you’re doing anything to conceal, shield, or harbor illegal aliens from being deported—or encouraging them to remain in the country—you could violate the federal harboring statute,” Fahey emphasized.
Tom Homan: “Is This Impediment? DOJ Needs to Decide”
Former ICE Director Tom Homan, known for his hardline stance on immigration, has amplified the criticism. Speaking to Fox News host Laura Ingraham, Homan said he had reached out to senior officials at the Department of Justice for clarification.
“I sent an email today to the Deputy Attorney General,” Homan said. “At what level is that impediment? Is that an impediment? Is she crossing the line?”
While Homan admitted he is not an attorney, he stated that the concept of “impediment” could apply if Ocasio-Cortez’s actions hinder federal law enforcement officers from doing their job.
“We need some further guidance on that. But again, if we have to take every federal dollar out of the city, we’ll do it,” he added, referencing the potential for funding cuts to sanctuary cities.
Legal Gray Area: Obstruction, Harboring, or Public Service?
At the heart of the controversy is a complex legal question: When does providing information cross into criminal territory?
Under federal law, obstruction of justice involves willfully interfering with the enforcement of the law. Meanwhile, harboring or shielding undocumented immigrants—including actions that encourage them to remain in the U.S. unlawfully—can also trigger criminal liability under 8 U.S. Code § 1324.
However, the First Amendment and established court precedents protect the dissemination of truthful legal information, even to individuals who are in the country illegally.
Civil liberties advocates argue that Ocasio-Cortez’s actions fall well within her rights as a public official. Her supporters say that ensuring individuals understand their constitutional protections is not only legal but a moral imperative—especially in immigrant-heavy districts like hers.
But critics maintain that the intent and framing of her messaging is what raises red flags.
“It’s not that she’s just sharing legal advice,” Fahey said. “It’s the way she’s doing it—mocking enforcement, characterizing ICE as political thugs, and encouraging non-compliance.”
Sanctuary Cities Also Under Scrutiny
Fahey didn’t stop at Ocasio-Cortez. He argued that many sanctuary cities—jurisdictions that limit cooperation with ICE—have long been in violation of federal law.
“Certainly getting very close to the line. I don’t know that she’s gotten over it. But many of these sanctuary cities not only are over the line, but have been over the line for the last five years,” he claimed.
The Justice Department, he suggested, will now need to determine whether to take a retrospective approach to investigate past behavior or push for cooperation moving forward.
What the Webinar Actually Said
The webinar itself, available online, was focused on community education. Genia Blaser from the Immigrant Defense Project told viewers:
“ICE raids are political tactics, and they’re often intended to create fear.”
She continued:
“This is a time where there is a lot of fear. And in fear, it’s really important to have knowledge because knowledge is power.”
The event discussed practical steps people can take if approached by immigration agents, including the importance of asking to see a warrant, not answering the door, and seeking legal counsel.
Ocasio-Cortez emphasized that no one should feel powerless, and her office provided contact information for free legal support and rights education.
Political Reactions: Divided as Expected
As expected, the political response has been sharply divided.
Conservatives have hailed Homan and Fahey’s comments as courageous and necessary, arguing that immigration enforcement is being actively undermined by public officials like Ocasio-Cortez.
Progressives, on the other hand, are calling the uproar politically motivated, noting that providing legal resources is protected conduct and that the U.S. has a long history of public advocacy groups offering similar support without consequence.
One Democratic strategist told The Hill:
“This is yet another attempt to criminalize compassion. AOC is doing what every member of Congress should be doing—making sure her constituents know their rights.”
Could AOC Face Legal Action?
At this time, no formal investigation or charges have been brought against Rep. Ocasio-Cortez. However, Homan’s remarks suggest that he is actively encouraging the Department of Justice to issue an opinion.
Whether DOJ officials agree that the congresswoman’s actions constitute “impediment” remains to be seen.
Legal experts say the bar for criminal charges is high.
“For obstruction or harboring charges to stick, prosecutors would have to prove intent—specifically that AOC knowingly tried to hinder law enforcement,” said legal analyst Dana Roth. “That’s a tough case to make when all she’s done is publicly disseminate legal information.”
Final Thoughts: Advocacy or Interference?
The situation unfolding around AOC’s immigration webinar highlights a growing national debate over the roles and responsibilities of elected officials in immigration enforcement.
Is it illegal to tell people they don’t have to open the door for ICE without a warrant? Is it obstruction to advise someone of their constitutional rights? Does it constitute harboring if a congresswoman provides resources to individuals at risk of deportation?
For now, the legal lines remain blurry—but the political lines are drawn in bold.
One thing is clear: this story isn’t going away any time soon.
